What paradox often describes Washington D.C.'s dining landscape discussion?

It is simultaneously touted as a national culinary capital and occasionally dismissed by locals.

The text immediately establishes that the conversation surrounding Washington D.C.'s food scene involves a dual perception. On one hand, the city is frequently praised as a national culinary capital, suggesting high quality and importance. On the other hand, locals often view the scene critically, finding it underwhelming or overly expensive relative to the perceived value. This contrast between national acclaim and local skepticism forms the central paradox that defines much of the discussion about eating in D.C., reflecting its unique demographic makeup of transient residents and political figures.