What does the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) point out regarding red snapper size?
Answer
Many species labeled as red snapper are excellent eating fish across most size ranges.
Fisheries experts, specifically the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), provide a counterpoint to the belief that large snapper are inherently poor quality. NOAA observes that many species categorized as red snapper, particularly the esteemed American variety, are generally considered excellent eating regardless of their size range. The agency implies that perceived quality issues in larger fish might be situational—perhaps resulting from localized diet, habitat differences, or stress/improper handling after the catch—rather than being an unavoidable consequence of the fish simply surpassing a certain weight threshold.
Related Questions
What are the texture and taste characteristics of American Red Snapper flesh?What common adage do fishermen often suggest about larger snapper eating quality?What does the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) point out regarding red snapper size?What might impart stronger, less desirable flavors into older, larger snapper tissues?Which essential elements are supplied considerably by red snapper according to dietary analysis?How does red snapper's mercury content compare to very large, long-lived predatory fish?Why does the firmness of desirable snapper excel when cooked quickly over high, direct heat like grilling?In the Gulf of Mexico, what scientific name identifies the gold standard American Red Snapper?How does the clean taste of premium snapper contrast with some other saltwater fish?What factor often outweighs the size differential between a 10-pound and 20-pound fish from the same stock?