What is the primary concern driving the figurative standard of fitness?
Answer
Reputation and readiness for external judgment or circulation
When the phrase is used figuratively, such as describing a draft manuscript, the core issue is not biological danger but the status of the material itself relative to external perception. The concern revolves around maintaining reputation and ensuring the material has reached an appropriate stage of completion or refinement. A poorly written draft is considered figuratively damaging to the author's professional image or brand, much like a spoiled apple is literally dangerous. Therefore, reputation and readiness dictate whether the material is suitable for public view.
Related Questions
What defines the literal standard of fitness for human consumption?What distinguishes the figurative meaning of 'not fit for public consumption'?How does Kashrut illustrate a layered determination of fitness?What is the primary concern driving the figurative standard of fitness?What metric is predominantly used to evaluate the figurative standard of fitness?What makes internal company documentation 'not fit for public consumption' digitally?What is the literal consequence if a substance is deemed *not* fit for human consumption?What is the figurative equivalent of a health inspection for information sharing?Which terms serve as synonyms for the literal fitness of food to eat?What specific scenario illustrates figurative unsuitability in customer service?