What is the figurative equivalent of a health inspection for information sharing?
Answer
The subjective quality control check required for editing and vetting information
The need to review and vet information before releasing it is paralleled by physical testing in food safety. Just as food requires time for testing and certification to ensure it is literally fit, information requires time for editing and subjective vetting to ensure it is figuratively fit for the audience. This subjective quality control check—asking if the material is the best and most appropriate version—serves as the figurative equivalent to the rigorous health inspection required for edible items before they are cleared for use.
Related Questions
What defines the literal standard of fitness for human consumption?What distinguishes the figurative meaning of 'not fit for public consumption'?How does Kashrut illustrate a layered determination of fitness?What is the primary concern driving the figurative standard of fitness?What metric is predominantly used to evaluate the figurative standard of fitness?What makes internal company documentation 'not fit for public consumption' digitally?What is the literal consequence if a substance is deemed *not* fit for human consumption?What is the figurative equivalent of a health inspection for information sharing?Which terms serve as synonyms for the literal fitness of food to eat?What specific scenario illustrates figurative unsuitability in customer service?