Which two governmental bodies are mentioned as defining food loss and waste (FLW) based *only* on the edible portion?
Answer
USDA and FAO
Some organizations, specifically naming the USDA and FAO, define food loss and waste based exclusively on the edible portion of the food item.
Related Questions
What fundamental quality does the term **edibility** describe?To what Latin root does the adjective *edible* trace its origins?What aspect does the definition of edibility focus on, rather than mandating flavor or ease of consumption?Which term addresses the *desirability* of food, often contrasting with mere technical edibility?What attribute is explicitly described as a separate attribute from the initial capability to be eaten?The concept of edibility is noted to exist on a spectrum heavily influenced by which contextual factors?Which two governmental bodies are mentioned as defining food loss and waste (FLW) based *only* on the edible portion?According to data comparisons, what is the numerical impact of classifying the broccoli stalk as edible versus inedible in waste estimates?In contemporary commerce, what does the term **cannabis edible** specifically refer to?Approximately how frequently does the specific noun form *edibility* appear in modern written English?