According to Time magazine, how did U.S. housewives perceive the loss of pre-sliced bread?
Answer
Almost as bad as gas rationing—and a whale of a lot more trouble
The perception among U.S. housewives regarding the ban was one of intense frustration and significant inconvenience, far exceeding what governmental planners anticipated. Time magazine captured this sentiment by comparing the imposition of manual slicing to the impact of gas rationing, implying it was a severe disruption to daily routine. For families requiring many slices daily for breakfast toast and lunch sandwiches, the constant manual labor became a considerable burden, leading to reports of frustration, poor cutting results, and a measurable decline in household morale and efficiency, as illustrated by correspondents like Sue Forrester.
Related Questions
What year did Otto Frederick Rohwedder's commercial bread-slicing vision first reach service?Which specific order enacted the 1943 nationwide ban on pre-sliced bread?Who was the Secretary of Agriculture responsible for issuing the bread slicing prohibition?What secondary market strain resulted from the sudden requirement for home slicing?According to Time magazine, how did U.S. housewives perceive the loss of pre-sliced bread?Which materials, besides wheat/flour costs, were the primary targets for conservation via the ban?What specific competitive disadvantage did Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia's ruling create in the baking industry?Which Indiana Congressman strongly condemned the sliced bread prohibition as 'dictatorial abuse of power'?What major finding led Secretary Wickard to reverse the nationwide ban in early March 1943?By what year had sales of pre-sliced loaves surpassed those of unsliced bread, fundamentally changing American eating habits?