When manufacturers express support for *mandatory* labeling laws, what system are critics concerned this might be a tactic to supersede?
Answer
More rigorous voluntary labeling efforts.
Critics argue that supporting mandatory disclosure can be a tactic to delay or supersede more rigorous voluntary labeling efforts or to ensure the resulting label is minimally informative.
Related Questions
What is the classic Coca-Cola in the United States often sweetened with?In which specific location or offering is Coke frequently reported to use cane sugar instead of HFCS?What stance has Coca-Cola generally taken regarding mandatory GMO disclosure legislation?What ingredient primarily links many Coca-Cola formulations sold in North America to genetically modified crops?What do consumer advocate groups actively campaign for Coca-Cola to do voluntarily?When manufacturers express support for *mandatory* labeling laws, what system are critics concerned this might be a tactic to supersede?For a consumer in the US seeking non-GMO certainty in mainstream Coke, what action is generally necessary?What external market factor causes ingredient sourcing in the massive Coca-Cola supply chain to fluctuate?The question of GMO presence in Coca-Cola is heavily dependent on which three primary variables?What is the primary focus of advocacy when discussing the use of HFCS derived from GM corn?